Если кто-то окружил своего соседа (полями) с трех сторон, и он ограждал первую, вторую и третью, он (сосед) не обязан (разделять расходы на фехтование), [потому что он (первый) сделал не принесет ему никакой пользы, его земля все еще открыта. Но если он (первый) ограждает четвертую сторону, и в этом случае он определенно приносит ему пользу, он (сосед) обязан номинально оплатить половину стоимости камыша (т. Е. Камышового забора), но не половину его (расходы первого. Потому что он (сосед) может сказать ему: для меня достаточно перегородки из тростника, и я не хочу расходовать забор из камня.] Р. Йосси говорит: Если он (первый) возникла и ограждена четвертой (стороной), все наложено на него (соседа) [то есть половину фактических расходов на фехтование. И в этом разница между первой танной и Р. Йосси. Галаха соответствует R Йосси. И само собой разумеется, что если окруженный ограждал четвертую сторону, давая понять, что он одобряет фехтование своего соседа, все навязывается ему, и он оплачивает половину расходов своего соседа.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
אין מחייבין אותו – for it doesn’t benefit him at all, for his land is still open. But, if he (i.e., the other partner) fenced in the fourth side, for now, it absolutely benefits him, we require him to pay one-half the cost of the purchase at the cheapest rate. But not half of his outlay, for he says to him: For me it is enough for me with a partition of reeds, and I don’t need an outlay of a stone fence.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
Introduction
Mishnah three discusses a person who builds a fence partially around another person’s property and wishes that person to share in the costs of the fence.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Batra
מגלגלין עליו את הכל – one-half of his outlay according to what he fenced in. And there is the difference between the first Tanna/teacher and Rabbi Yosi. And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yosi. And we don’t have to say if he himself is the one who fenced in the fourth side, for he revealed his intention that he is pleased with what his fellow fenced in that we make him bear the expenses for the fencing in of everything, and he pays his fellow half of his outlays.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
If a man’s land surrounded his fellow’s land on three sides, and he fenced it on the first and the second and the third sides, they do not obligate him [to share in the costs]. Rabbi Yose says: “If he rose a built a fence on the fourth side, they obligate him to share in all of the costs.” In the scenario discussed in this mishnah Reuven owns three fields which surround Shimon’s fields on three of its four sides. If Reuven were to fence in all three of his fields he would have built a fence around three sides of Shimon’s fields. Since this fence does not totally surround Shimon’s field, Reuven cannot claim that Shimon benefited from the field and should therefore share in the costs. Rabbi Yose adds that if Shimon were to fence in four sides, he would thereby show that he wished to have his field fenced in. In that case he is obligated to share in the costs of all of the fences, since he now benefits from them all.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Batra
Questions for Further Thought: • If Reuven owns fields surrounding all four sides of Shimon’s field and he puts a fence around all of them, will Shimon have to share in the costs?
